Legal Opinion

Burkett v. Smyder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1988No. 661PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Appellees filed a declaratory judgment action against Appellants alleging that they had acquired a prescriptive easement to cross Appellants’ land. Appellants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings in which they argued that Appellees had failed to join a landowner whose land was also involved in the instant suit. The trial court denied this motion.

Following a non-jury trial, the trial court found that Appellees had used a roadway which intersects Appellants’ land for a period in excess of 21 years. Thus, the prescriptive easement had been established. Following the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartley v. LangkampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Minteer v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Walley v. IracaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. PA Energy Vision, LLC v. South Avis Realty, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Sprankle v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Guiser, S. v. Sieber, M. & S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Gehres v. Falls TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API