Legal Opinion

Sprankle v. Burns

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1996PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order which enjoined the defendant, Craig Burns, from blocking or otherwise impeding pas sage over a road lying across unenclosed woodland in Blair County. The trial court reasoned that defendant should be enjoined (1) because he had failed to prove that his ownership of the underlying surface extended to the full width of the road at all points; and (2) because the court intended to declare the road a public way, it was unnecessary to determine whether neighboring landowners had prescriptive rights in the roadway. 1 Unfortunately, the trial court was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Felmlee v. LockettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Bodman v. BodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Krosnar v. Schmidt Krosnar McNaughton Garrett Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Minteer v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Shaffer v. Baylor's Lake Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Roberts v. Estate of PursleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Williams, D. v. Taylor, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Lillo v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Baumgardner v. StuckeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API