Legal Opinion

Gehres v. Falls Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 2008No. 1648 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

This case involves a dispute as to whether a municipality enjoys a public, prescriptive easement to discharge storm water runoff across private property. Larry Gehres and his wife, Marlene Gehres, (Plaintiffs) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of the 44th Judicial District (Wyoming County Branch) (trial court) denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the non-jury verdict (JNOV) in favor of Falls Township (Township). Plaintiffs contend the Township’s evidence failed to establish the elements of a prescriptive easement. For the following reasons, we…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Shamnoski v. Pg EnergySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Shinn v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Estojak v. MazsaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cheng v. Septa & MV Transportation, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Rachel Carson Trails Conservancy, Inc. v. Dep't of Conservation & Natural Res. of Pa.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. G.M. Schnarrs and R.E. Schnarrs v. Rush Twp. Board of Supervisors: J. ShannonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Leiphart v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. John William Mayton v. Jane OliverCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API