Legal Opinion

Hart v. O'MALLEY

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1994PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this appeal, we must determine if an individual, who should have been joined as an indispensable party in an equity action but was not joined as an indispensable party, now has standing to bring a cause of action for wrongful use of civil proceedings against the party who instituted the equity action. We conclude that an indispensable party has standing to bring a cause of action for wrongful use of civil proceedings. We are next asked to determine if 1) the complaint alleges causes of action for wrongful use of civil proceedings and abuse of process against the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. General Refractories Company Grefco, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company Gilberg & Kiernan Andrew Butz General Refractories CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. Shiner v. MoriartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Rosembert v. Borough of East LansdowneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Orange Stones Co. v. City of ReadingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Sabella, D. v. Appalachian Development Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API