Legal Opinion

American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 10, 1946No. C. D. 997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

In these cases the plaintiff seeks to recover duties claimed to have been improperly assessed and collected on importations of what are known as limestone spalls. The collector classified the merchandise under the provision in paragraph 203 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Canada published in T. D. 49762, for—

Limestone (not suitable for use as monumental or building stone), crude, or crushed but not pulverized.

*122with corresponding assessment of duty at the rate of 2% cents per 100 pounds. The protests make several claims. The claim principally…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Lackawanna Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  5. United States v. Rice Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Rausch v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API