Legal Opinion

Davies v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 20, 1968No. C.D. 3621PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

These nine protests, which were consolidated for trial, involve merchandise imported at Philadelphia from Austria and England. The imports consist of more than one hundred types of plastic articles — some assembled, others unassembled (in kit form)-— that are miniature replicas of various animate and inanimate objects. All the imports were classified by the collector as toys, not specially provided for, under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 percent ad valorem.1 *313Plaintiff makes numerous claims for classification (1)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pico Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Pacific Fast Mail, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Alloys Unlimited, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Evans v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Styson Art Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API