Rausch v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
These two protests which were consolidated for trial concern “V.I.P.” and “Scalextric” miniature auto raceway sets *656and separately invoiced spare parts and related equipment. The imports were assessed with duty at the rate of 35 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, for toys not specially provided for.1
Protest 60/19539 involves the V.I.P. raceway sets, parts and equipment. In that case it is claimed that the articles are properly dutiable at 13% percent ad valorem under paragraph 353 of the tariff act, as modified, which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Commercial Adolfo S. Pagan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Plastic Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Miles v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Pico Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971