Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Baum

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1913No. 8,286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Carroll Circuit Court; James P. Wason, Judge. Action by Edwin Baum and(others against John C. O’Con-nor and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.

This action was originally brought by George W. Baum, now deceased, against appellant O’Con-nor, on account for the price of some gravel. Upon affidavit by appellant O ’Connor, appellant Bowen was made a party defendant, as claiming some interest in the gravel, for the price of which the action was brought, and appellant Bowen afterwards filed his cross-complaint, setting up that appellant O ’Connor was indebted to him for gravel to the amount of $50, also asking that the title to certain lands, from which he claimed the gravel had been taken, be quieted in him. *197After the death of George W.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Central Union Telephone Co. v. FehringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Higinbotham v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Brown v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Spencer v. McGonagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gilbert v. LuskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Baltimore County v. AT & T CORP.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010
  4. Kepert v. KepertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API