Legal Opinion

Spencer v. McGonagle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1886No. 12,501PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellants’ complaint asserts title to an undivided interest in real estate and prays that a decree of partition be made severing the interests of the owners.

The cross complaint of the appellee asserts title to the whole of the land in controversy, and pleads specially the facts upon which the claim of title is founded. The facts pleaded arc, in substance, as follows:

On the 21st day of February, 1856, the real estate in dispute was owned by Calvin S. Dorwin, who died intestate, leaving as his heirs his widow, Jane E. Dorwin, and his children, Cornelius, Hannah, Mary, Milton and Ella;…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Snelson v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ragsdale v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Thompson v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. RenickerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Racer v. State ex rel. RhineIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API