Legal Opinion

Baltimore County v. AT & T CORP.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 20, 2010No. Case 1:04-cv-07014-DFH-TABPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation.

This case is the last contested portion of Multi-District Litigation No. 1313, In re AT & T Corporation Fiber Optic Cable Installation Litigation. The MDL case has managed and resolved claims arising from AT & T’s installation of fiber optic cable in the 1980’s along railroad corridors with permission from the railroads but without permission from the adjoining landowners. The plaintiffs have been owners of adjoining land who asserted claims against AT & T for trespass, slander of title, and…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peavler v. Law Firm of Krisor & AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  2. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. ZAYO GROUP LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Zayo Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
  4. Grdinich v. Plan Commission for the Town of Hebron IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  5. Rubygold Main Holdings, LLC v. Brian Gardner Carpentry, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API