Central Union Telephone Co. v. Fehring
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.
This action was brought by appellee, against appellant, to recover the statutory penalty under section 5529, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (section 2, p. 151, Acts 1885), for failure and refusal on the part of appellant to supply appellee with “telephone connection and facilities without discrimination or partiality.” The complaint was in two paragraphs, which were substantially the same, except the offense was alleged on different days. Appellant’s separate demurrer for want of facts to each paragraph of complaint was overruled.' An answer in three paragraphs was filed, to which a reply of general…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Daniels v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Central Union Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. FalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Bartley v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Shaw v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Devening v. BartholomewIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Hodges v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Kelley v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Town of WhitingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.