Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollhejm, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board’s (Board) order that affirmed a denial of her workers’ compensation claim. Claimant argues that the Board’s order is insufficient as a matter of law because (1) it concluded that claimant’s wrist injury was noncompensable due to a lack of objective findings without acknowledging evidence of edema contained in the medical record, and (2) it rejected without discussion other objective findings supported by the medical evidence. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.
The material facts are not disputed.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- SAIF Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wantowski v. Crown Cork & SealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- SAIF Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Stapleton v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001