Legal Opinion

Gourley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1991No. S014133PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C.J.

—We granted review to resolve an issue that has engendered conflicting appellate decisions: whether a plaintiff is entitled to receive prejudgment interest under Civil Code section 3291 (hereafter section 3291) on an award of compensatory and punitive damages for an insurer’s breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Section 3291 allows the plaintiff in “any action brought to recover damages for personal injury sustained by any person resulting from or occasioned by the tort of any other person, corporation, association, or partnership” (italics added)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. CHATEAU CHAMBERAY HOA v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Major v. Western Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Century Surety Co. v. PolissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API