Legal Opinion

In re Complaints of Lycourt-Donovan v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2017No. 2016-0080PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Connor, C.J.

*73 {¶ 1} This appeal is from orders issued by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio ("PUCO"). Appellants Katherine Lycourt-Donovan, Seneca Builders, L.L.C., and Ryan Roth are owners of residential property in the Toledo area who filed complaints against intervening appellee, Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., after it discontinued natural-gas service to their properties. Columbia Gas discontinued service upon discovering "stray gas" 1 near the homes.

*905 {¶ 2} Natural gas occurs underground and can migrate into the basement of a home through cracks in the foundation, drain lines, sewer lines, or other…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  2. In re Application of E. Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. In re Complaint of Harris Design Servs. v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In re Establishing the Solar Generation Fund RiderOhio Supreme Court · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API