Legal Opinion

Bendix Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 12, 1966No. C.D. 2759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case is designated on the invoice and entry papers as “Polarmatic 62.” It was imported from England and entered at the port of Cincinnati on May 21, 1963.1 It was classified as a polarimeter and assessed with duty at 50 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 228(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is. properly classifiable as a scientific or laboratory instrument at 22y2 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 360 of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Kaysons Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Henry Wild Surveying Instrument Supply Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Parsons Optical Laboratories Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. M. H. Garvey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API