Legal Opinion

Henry Wild Surveying Instrument Supply Co. of America v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 10, 1954No. C. D. 1586PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of certain glass prisms and glass micrometer drums that are essential parts of the “T3 precision theodolite,” an instrument used by engineers in surveying operations for determining the location of points both in vertical and horizontal planes.

The prisms and micrometer drums in question were classified as scientific articles, composed wholly or in chief value of glass, under paragraph 218 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and assessed with duty *92at the rate of 85 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiffs made three claims. The provisions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henry Wild Surveying Instrument Supply Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Bendix Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Parsons Optical Laboratories Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Celestaire, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API