Legal Opinion · Dissent

Swinson v. . Nance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1DissentBarnhill, J.

STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE, J., concur in dissent. As the result of an automobile collision, separate suits were brought by the four plaintiffs against the defendant, all claiming personal injury and damage sustained through defendant's negligence, and the plaintiff, J. T. Swinson, claiming, in addition, damages for injury to his car. For purposes of trial the four suits were consolidated, without objection, and tried. Issues relating to negligence, contributory negligence and damages in each case, were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of all the plaintiffs, respectively, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morris v. BloomgreenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Carlson v. MeusbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Rosenau v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. McCulley v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Quick v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Beanblossom v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Nichols v. . GoldstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API