Legal Opinion
Beanblossom v. Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 14, 1966No. 451, 452, 459PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Plaintiffs’ first assignment of error relates to the form of the second issue. This assignment is not based on an exception appearing in the case on appeal and, for that reason, will not be considered. Carpenter, Solicitor v. Boyles, 213 N.C. 432, 196 S.E. 850. The second assignment is to the ruling of the court allowing Patrolman Conrad to answer the following question on cross-examination:
“Q. Based upon your full and complete investigation of this accident, you didn’t charge Charlie Wilson Anderson with any traffic violation did you?
“A. No, Sir, I didn’t.”
The purpose of this question could…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Waddell v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Clark v. ScheldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. LindleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.