Legal Opinion

Sebastian v. Horton Motor Lines

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1938PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

There are a number of exceptions appearing on the record, but we deem it unnecessary to consider them seriatim as rulings upon the following will suffice to dispose of the present appeal.

First: Was it error for the court to instruct the jury that if the driver of defendant’s truck failed to stop at the “S T O P” sign on Benbow Road before entering the intersection with Washington Street, a through highway, “under the law that would be negligence per se, or negligence in itself”? The law as presently written answers the question in the affirmative.

It is provided by ch. 407, Public Laws 1937,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Shirley v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API