Legal Opinion

Rosenau v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1920No. 21,852PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Action in the district court for Martin county to recover $800 for wrecking plaintiffs automobile. Defendant’s counterclaim for injury to his car was dismissed at the trial. The case was tried before Dean, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $350. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

There was a collision at a highway intersection between an automobile owned by plaintiff and one owned and operated by defendant, and, on the claim that defendant negligently caused the same, plaintiff brought this action to recover for the damage thereby caused to his automobile. Defendant interposed a counterclaim for damages to his automobile, based on allegations that the collision was caused by the negligence of the driver of plaintiff’s car. The trial court dismissed the counterclaim, but submitted plaintiff’s cause of action to the jury. Plaintiff had a verdict and defendant appealed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kayser v. Van NestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Carlson v. MeusbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Dehaan v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Chandler v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API