Legal Opinion

Quick v. United Benefit Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1975No. 1PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The first question for decision is whether defendant Quick is a “slayer” as defined by G.S. 31A-3(3). If so, G.S. 31A-11 disqualifies her as a beneficiary under the policy.

G.S. 31A-3(3) provides:

“ ‘Slayer’ means
“a. Any person who by a court of competent jurisdiction shall have been convicted as a principal or accessory before the fact of the wilful and unlawful killing of another person; . . .” (Emphasis supplied.)

The question, therefore, is whether the crime of involuntary manslaughter is a “wilful and unlawful killing” within the meaning of the above cited provision. A…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Johnny Overstreet, Administrator of the Estate of David Wilkey, Deceased v. Kentucky Central Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  3. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Smith v. Independent Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API