Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Planned Development Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1990No. 880129PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff and defendant are abutting owners of real property situated in Weber County, Utah. Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to a 31.6-foot strip of land along their east boundary that is encroached upon by a fence. Defendant counterclaimed, seeking to establish the fence line as its west boundary by acquiescence. The district court, sitting without a jury, denied relief to either party. Plaintiff appeals, and defendant cross-appeals.

The facts are not in material dispute. The metes and bounds description contained in plaintiffs deed encloses the disputed strip…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Staker v. AinsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Western Kane County Special Service District No. 1 v. Jackson Cattle Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hendrickson v. FreericksAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In Re the Disconnection of Certain Territory From Highland CityUtah Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API