Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2013No. 20130056PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Patrick Wagner appeals from a summary judgment holding as a matter of law that his property is burdened by either an express or an implied roadway easement and dismissing his claims for injunc-tive relief and damages against Crossland Construction Company, Inc. (“Crossland”), Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. (“Baker”), M & K Hotshot & Trucking, Inc. (“M & K”), and Titan Specialties, Ltd. (“Titan”). We conclude that, as a matter of law, the language in the warranty deed at issue in this case did not create or reserve an express easement. We further conclude genuine…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Stracka v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bulger v. McCourtNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Gerrity Bakken, LLC v. Oasis Petroleum North America LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Jeffrey Gladchun and Alyssa Gladchun v. Michael Eramo, Diane Eramo and New Cingular Wireless, PCS, D/B/A AT&TSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Johnson v. ShieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Lincoln Land Development, LLP v. City of LincolnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API