Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Patrick Wagner appeals from a summary judgment holding as a matter of law that his property is burdened by either an express or an implied roadway easement and dismissing his claims for injunc-tive relief and damages against Crossland Construction Company, Inc. (“Crossland”), Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. (“Baker”), M & K Hotshot & Trucking, Inc. (“M & K”), and Titan Specialties, Ltd. (“Titan”). We conclude that, as a matter of law, the language in the warranty deed at issue in this case did not create or reserve an express easement. We further conclude genuine…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Stracka v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Bulger v. McCourtNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Gerrity Bakken, LLC v. Oasis Petroleum North America LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Jeffrey Gladchun and Alyssa Gladchun v. Michael Eramo, Diane Eramo and New Cingular Wireless, PCS, D/B/A AT&TSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- Johnson v. ShieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Lincoln Land Development, LLP v. City of LincolnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.