Legal Opinion

In Re the Disconnection of Certain Territory From Highland City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1983No. 18191PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order of disconnection. Appellant Highland City (also known as Highland Town) seeks a new trial, arguing that the district court erred in (1) holding that justice and equity require disconnection; (2) failing to consider all the evidence produced at trial; and (3) refusing either to amend its findings and the order of disconnection or to grant the City a new trial on newly discovered evidence. (4) Additionally, the City contends in oral argument that statutory amendments enacted after the district court’s decision apply retroactively and require a new…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In re J. P.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Campbell v. American Foreign SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. HiggsUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Heathman v. GilesUtah Supreme Court · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Cedar Hills CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Washington National Insurance Co. v. Sherwood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Shapo v. Tires 'N Tracks, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. In Re State in Interest of JpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  5. Nephi City v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API