Legal Opinion
Hendrickson v. Freericks
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1981No. 4292, 4565 and 4605PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
These consolidated appeals arise from a dispute concerning a lease agreement to certain real property located in Fairbanks, Alaska [hereinafter referred to as the Young property].
Andrew Hall and Stanley Young owned adjacent pieces of property in downtown Fairbanks. In the 1940’s, the two men entered into a party wall agreement and constructed adjoining office buildings on their respective properties. During the course of construction, Young ran short of money and so they agreed that Hall would complete Young’s building. In exchange, Hall received a ten-year lease to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- John R. Hansen, Inc. v. Pacific International Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Julian v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Norton v. HerronAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.