Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Farnsworth

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1935No. Civ. 8852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

This is an action against the principal and surety on a bond given to the County of Los Angeles for the faithful performance of a contract to cause certain public improvements to be made for the benefit of .a subdivided tract of land. The trial court.held the contract, and therefore the bond, to be without consideration. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant.

The land was subdivided by Peterson, Farnsworth and Glessman, title standing in the name of a trustee. When their subdivision map was submitted to the board of supervisors for approval on or about…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Richardson v. LampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. McDonough v. Chu Chew ShongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Wilson v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API