Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1938No. L. A. No. 16743PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNARD, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff filed for probate a will signed by one Emma IT. Wilson, dated May 17, 1933, and naming him as principal beneficiary and as executor. Shortly thereafter the defendant filed for probate another will, dated October 24, 1933, naming her as principal beneficiary and as executrix. The plaintiff filed objections to the probate of that will upon the ground, among others, that it appeared that the date thereon had been altered. An interesting sidelight on this contention may be found in the opinion in People v. Gilbert, 26 Cal. App. (2d) l [78 Pac. (2d) 770], On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Lopez v. WislerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API