Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Arnold

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1902No. S.F. No. 2108PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants.

It is averred in the complaint that prior to and on July 10, 1896, plaintiff and the defendant H. B. Arnold were copartners carrying on a retail grocery business, and as copartners were owners of a stock of goods and groceries of a named value, and also, as such copartners, were owners of certain described pieces of real property, and also of certain shares in-certain loan associations; that on said July 10th plaintiff was sick, and for the purpose of enabling the defendant H. B. Arnold to alone freely handle said business…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. S. Spiegal & Son v. AlpirnNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kent v. First Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API