Arnold v. Arnold
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants.
It is averred in the complaint that prior to and on July 10, 1896, plaintiff and the defendant H. B. Arnold were copartners carrying on a retail grocery business, and as copartners were owners of a stock of goods and groceries of a named value, and also, as such copartners, were owners of certain described pieces of real property, and also of certain shares in-certain loan associations; that on said July 10th plaintiff was sick, and for the purpose of enabling the defendant H. B. Arnold to alone freely handle said business…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hayes v. ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by32 opinions
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- S. Spiegal & Son v. AlpirnNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Kent v. First Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.