Legal Opinion
Cavalier Telephone, LLC v. Verizon Virginia Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 27, 2002No. Civ.A. 3:01CV736PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPENCER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Verizon Virginia’s Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is granted in full.
I
Cavalier Telephone (“Cavalier”) competes with Verizon Virginia (“Verizon”) in the basic telecommunications services market. Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“the 1996 Act”), 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILECs”) like Verizon are required to provide certain facilities to competing local carriers, such as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seven-Up Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tao of Systems Integration, Inc. v. Analytical Services & Materials, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Nomura Securities International, Inc. v. ETrade Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Verizon New York, Inc. v. Global NAPS, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. SteuerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007