Legal Opinion

Verizon New York, Inc. v. Global NAPS, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 1, 2006No. 1:03CV05073ENV-RMLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VITALIANO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Verizon New York Inc., Verizon New England Inc., Verizon New Jersey Inc., Verizon Pennsylvania Inc., Verizon Maryland Inc., Verizon Washington, DC Inc., and Verizon Virginia Inc. (collectively “Verizon”) and defendants Global NAPS, Inc., Global NAPS Virginia, Inc., and Global NAPS South, Inc. (collectively “Global”) are two families of telecommunications industry competitors partnered through a shotgun wedding orchestrated by legislative policy designed to ensure the compatible, competitive, and cost efficient delivery of telephone…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central Telephone Co. v. Sprint Communications Co. of Virginia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  2. CenturyTel of Chatham, LLC v. Sprint Communications Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2016
  3. Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global Naps, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  4. Osier v. Burlington TelecomVermont Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API