Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1968No. 83PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Each appellant assigns as error the court’s denial of his motion for a separate trial. These assignments raise the question whether a defendant, who is jointly indicted with another or others and moves for a severance, has a right to a separate trial when the State will offer in evidence the confession or admission of a codefendant which implicates the movant in the crime charged and is inadmissible against him.

At the time this case was tried below, we followed the general rule that whether defendants jointly indicted would be tried jointly or separately was in the sound discretion of the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. PersingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API