State v. Puryear
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant brings forward thirteen assignments of error grouped into nine arguments. The first two arguments are in support of six assignments of error wherein defendant contends that the judge erred in admitting what defendant contends is hearsay evidence. Defendant further contends that the admission of the alleged hearsay evidence violated his constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him.
The exceptions are to the testimony of Dickens when he was allowed:
1. To testify relative to the two telephone conversations he had with Tommie Puryear prior to being seized and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. . OuterbridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- State v. DozierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. RhyneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. LouchheimCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.