State v. Louchheim
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The defendant brings forward in his brief, consisting of 76 pages, eight assignments of error in seven arguments. Their voluminosity demands that we treat each of them, albeit briefly.
First, defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to an invalid search warrant because the supporting affidavit of Curtis Ellis (a) fails to show that the confidential informant was reliable as to the information, (b) fails to show probable cause in that the information of the informant was 14 months old, (c) is defective in that the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. KornegaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Delano Compton, etc. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- State v. LangCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- United States v. ShearerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Delano Compton, etc. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.