Legal Opinion

Robinson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1997No. 95-CF-758PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

Royce R. Robinson was convicted by a jury of distribution of a controlled substance. On appeal, Robinson contends that his conviction must be reversed because, he claims, the judge constructively amended the indictment. Robinson bases this contention on the fact that the indictment specified that the controlled substance which he allegedly distributed was heroin, whereas the evidence at trial established that the drug was in fact cocaine.

Judge King and I are of the opinion that there was no constructive amendment, that Robinson was not prejudiced by any variance, and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Wooley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Pace v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Digsby v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API