Legal Opinion

Digsby v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 2009No. 06-CF-1585PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

A jury found appellant, Nathaniel J. Digsby, guilty of unlawful possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (heroin) and unlawful possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (marijuana), 1 both in violation of D.C.Code § 48-904.01(a)(l) (2001); and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of § 48-1103(a). 2 Mr. Digsby contends that his conviction must be reversed because the trial court violated his constitutional Sixth Amendment confrontation right by ruling, over his objection, that a Drug Enforcement Administration…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Damian J. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Carrington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Antwan Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. McClary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Antwan Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API