Legal Opinion

Wooley v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1997No. 95-CF-1399PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Judge FERREN. *

Wooley appeals his conviction for unlawful possession with intent to distribute (PWID) a controlled substance, D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1993 Repl), alleging primarily that he was denied his Fifth Amendment right to be tried only on charges contained in the grand jury’s indictment. 1 More specifically, he claims a Fifth Amendment violation because the indictment alleged that the controlled substance in question was heroin, while the evidence at trial made clear that the drugs were in fact cocaine. We conclude that, in legal effect, the trial court constructively…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Maddox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Tyler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. O'Brien v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API