Stirone v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Petitioner Nicholas Stiróne was indicted and convicted in a federal court for unlawfully interfering with interstate commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act. The crucial question here is whether he was convicted of an offense not charged in the indictment.
So far as relevant' to this question the indictment charged the following:
From 1951’ until 1953, a man by the name of William G. Rider had a contract to supply ready-mixed concrete from his plant in Pennsylvania to be used for the erection of a steel-processing plant at Allenport, Pennsylvania. For the purpose of performing this contract Rider
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,932 opinions
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
1,927 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.