Legal Opinion

Kovaniemi v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1934No. 29,912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. OLSEN, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.

The action is one in replevin to recover possession of an automobile or its value if possession cannot be had. The complaint alleges ownership and right to possession in plaintiff, the value of the car, and defendants’ refusal to surrender same. Defendants’ answer is a general denial, followed by a counterclaim for recovery of damages for fraud on the part of the plaintiff in inducing defendants to purchase the car in question on contract. Damages are alleged in the amount of $671.90. All we need say here is that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Smith v. Gray Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. State v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Bullock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Hawley v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Hess v. KoskovitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. The Rochester Bread Co. v. Rapinwax Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Ickler v. HilgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API