Legal Opinion

State v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 1924No. 23,908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, 0.

To an indictment charging them with the unlawful sale, on August 27, 1923, of one-fifth of a pint of intoxicating liquor to Harriet Lazelle, the defendants entered a plea of not guilty. They were tried, convicted, and have appealed from the judgment of conviction.

They seek to reverse the judgment on the ground that the verdict was not justified by the evidence in that it was not shown that they owned the liquor furnished to the woman or that there was a sale, giving to that word the meaning ascribed to it by section 1, chapter 416, p. 587, Laws 1923.

*49Defendants resided in the village…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SailorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marion v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. State v. ShansySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. State v. FinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. The Rochester Bread Co. v. Rapinwax Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Mullany v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API