Ickler v. Hilger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
In this action plaintiff claims that pursuant to the terms and conditions of an oral contract between the parties he is entitled to recover from defendant the sum of $12,502.80, representing the proceeds from a certain reserve commission account, hereinafter described, and compensation for services rendered to defendant. After a jury trial, a verdict was returned for plaintiff for $12,460. From an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial, defendant appeals.
It appears that plaintiff entered defendant’s employ in November 1929 as a salesman on a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State v. SoltauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. JansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Dehen v. BerningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Timmerman v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ryan v. City of CrookstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Forseth v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964