Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Town of Stuntz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1929No. 27,413PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, if that be denied, then for a new trial.

Plaintiff, a civil engineer, performed services for the defendant in preparing plans and specifications for the paving of a highway in the township and services incidental thereto, including attention to the advertising for bids and examination and checking of bids received. The services were fully performed. At the trial of the case plaintiff recovered a verdict for the amount claimed. . .

The assignments of error present the question…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Smith v. Gray Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. James E. Carlson, Inc. v. BablerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Dobrowoloske v. ParpalaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christenson v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Katzmarek v. Weber Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. The Rochester Bread Co. v. Rapinwax Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Kovaniemi v. ShermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Petrich v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API