Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gray Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1926No. 25,350PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

On May 15, 1924, plaintiff purchased a used automobile from the Gray Motor Company of Minneapolis for the sum of $1,475. He paid $500 on receiving the car and was to pay the remaining $975 in 12 equal monthly instalments. He claims that when he gave the motor company his check for the cash payment of $500, they presented a blank form as the instalment contract for the remaining payments which he signed without reading and in which none of the blanks had then been filled out. Two or three weeks later, the Mercantile Acceptance Company mailed him a notice from Chicago that they had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Smith v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. MerriganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Bosch v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Bergh v. SloanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gimmestad v. Rose Brothers Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Heise v. the JR Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Kedrowski v. CzechSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Coble v. LaceySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API