Legal Opinion

Hess v. Koskovitch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1954No. 36,139PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Action is brought by plaintiff to recover damages for breach of express warranty and fraud against defendant L. A. Koskovitch and two other named defendants arising out of the sale of a milk condenser. At the close of plaintiff’s case the trial court granted the motion of one defendant for dismissal and at the conclusion of all the testimony denied motions for directed verdicts on behalf of defendant Koskovitch and the other defendant. The jury returned a verdict for $1,475 against defendant Koskovitch alone. Defendant Koskovitch, hereinafter referred to as defendant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. J. A. Tyrholm Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Skolnick v. GruesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Harris v. EggermontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Kovaniemi v. ShermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Thelen v. SpilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Coble v. LaceySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API