Legal Opinion

Newman v. Larsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1964No. Civ. 27783PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Defendant was convicted in a prior criminal proceeding of assault with a deadly weapon, in violation of Penal Code section 245. At the conclusion of trial the information was amended, changing the word “deadly” to “dangerous” and defendant was granted probation on conditions which included payment for damages resulting from the injuries. The victim of the assault thereafter brought this civil action for damages for assault and battery for the critical injuries sustained.

Counsel for plaintiff urged the collateral estoppel principle announced in Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Insurance Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Loury v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Lopez v. SurchiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. SandovalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. People Ex Rel. State of Cal. v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Pebbles v. Steven C.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Tradewind Ins. Co., Ltd. v. StoutHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API