Legal Opinion

Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 6, 1970PublishedCited by 211 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wentraub, C. J.

The defendant carrier issued a Home Owner’s policy to plaintiff, Burd, providing him with “Comprehensive Personal Liability Coverage.” The ultimate issue is whether the policy covers the liability incurred by Burd when he inflicted shotgun wounds upon August D’Agostino.

The shooting incident led to the conviction of Burd for atrocious assault and battery. Thereafter D’Agostino sued Burd for damages. His complaint contained two counts. The first count charged that Burd “did maliciously and in*387tentionally fire a loaded gun at the plaintiff”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  4. Hurtt v. StironeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Grieb v. Citizens Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by211 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API