Legal Opinion

Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1962No. L. A. 26913PublishedCited by 307 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Alleging losses by robbery, plaintiff corporations brought this action to recover $244,510.90 under contracts of insurance with defendant insurers. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, and the trial court granted defendants’ motion for new trial on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiffs appeal from the order granting a new trial. Defendants appeal from the judgment.

We agree with defendants’ contention that their plea of collateral estoppel defeats plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by307 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API