Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Alleging losses by robbery, plaintiff corporations brought this action to recover $244,510.90 under contracts of insurance with defendant insurers. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, and the trial court granted defendants’ motion for new trial on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiffs appeal from the order granting a new trial. Defendants appeal from the judgment.
We agree with defendants’ contention that their plea of collateral estoppel defeats plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by307 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.