James v. James
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action to quiet title to certain lots of land situate, lying, and being in the city of Los Angeles, county of Los Angeles. The action was originally begun against Howard T. James and Hortense James, his wife. Hortense James having died, the action was dismissed as to her.
The complaint is in the usual form of a pleading in an action to quiet title, alleges that the plaintiff is and ever since the month of August, 1922, has been the owner of the lots of land described in the complaint, alleges that the defendant claims some interest therein, and that the interest of the defendant is without…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Dale v. DaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Masero v. BessoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.