Legal Opinion

Dale v. Dale

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1927No. Docket No. 6059PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from that portion of an interlocutory judgment of divorce which holds that sixty acres of land in Humboldt County, and certain personal property, which was conveyed from a husband to his wife “as her separate property,” was in fact community property.

Appellant and respondent intermarried at Eureka, September 8, 1904, and lived together as husband and wife until April, 1924. The respondent, on October 23, 1918, executed and delivered to appellant a deed of conveyance of sixty acres of land, and a bill of sale of certain personal property, which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Horsman v. MadenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Odone v. MarzocchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Ballinger v. BallingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API