Isham v. Isham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiff, Carol L. Isham, appeals 1 from the decision of the trial court, denying her motion to, inter alia, find the defendant, F. Lance Isham, in contempt of the judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage for improperly basing his alimony payments to the plaintiff on his “salary” only, rather than on his employment “income,” which includes bonus compensation, and to establish a payment schedule to satisfy the amount that the defendant had underpaid. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined that the alimony provision in the parties’ separation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. VilalastraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Remillard v. RemillardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Karas v. Liberty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Afkari-Ahmadi v. Fotovat-AhmadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Connecticut National Bank v. Rehab AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.