Legal Opinion
Greenburg v. Greenburg
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 11, 1992No. 10182PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s decision granting the plaintiff the right to determine which colleges the parties’ children will attend pursuant to a stipulated separation agreement. The defendant claims that the decision is clearly erroneous and constitutes an impermissible modification of a contract for support. We agree.
*592The relevant facts are as follows. The parties’ marriage was dissolved in January, 1983, at which time a written separation agreement was incorporated by reference into the decree of dissolution. The parties first wrote the agreement and then gave it to an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Mihalyak v. MihalyakConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Harvey v. DaddonaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Sheppard v. SheppardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Mandel v. MandelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.